West Asia Conflict Could Push 2.5 Million Indians into Poverty

The UNDP report warns that 8.8 million globally may be impacted, with South Asia facing the largest poverty risks amid escalating tensions.
SuryaSurya
5 mins read
West Asia conflict deepens India poverty

Introduction

The ongoing military escalation in West Asia has emerged as a significant macroeconomic and human development shock for South Asia. According to the UNDP's 2025 report, the conflict could push up to 2.5 million Indians into poverty and cost the Asia-Pacific region up to $299 billion, exposing India's deep structural dependencies on Gulf energy, labour, and trade linkages.

"Through higher fuel, freight, and input costs, the shock is diminishing household purchasing power, raising food insecurity, straining public budgets, and weakening livelihoods." — UNDP, Military Escalation in the Middle East: Human Development Impacts Across Asia and the Pacific

IndicatorValue
India's poverty rate (pre-crisis)23.9%
India's poverty rate (post-crisis)24.2%
People pushed into poverty in India~24.6 lakh
Total in poverty in India (pre-crisis)35.15 crore
Total in poverty in India (post-crisis)35.40 crore
HDI progress loss (India)0.03–0.12 years
Global population at poverty risk8.8 million
Asia-Pacific economic costUp to $299 billion

Background & Context

West Asia (Middle East) is central to India's energy security, labour diaspora, and trade architecture. The region accounts for over 40% of India's crude oil imports, 90% of LPG imports, and 45% of fertiliser imports. With 9.37 million Indians residing in GCC countries (MEA, October 2024), remittances from this corridor constitute 38–40% of India's total inward remittances — making any Gulf disruption a direct threat to household incomes across multiple Indian states.

The UNDP report simulates conflict scenarios (including a 28-day escalation with 8-month economic adjustment) to assess downstream impacts on poverty, HDI, food security, employment, and trade.


Key Impact Areas

1. Energy & Inflation

India imports over 90% of its oil needs. Disruptions around the Strait of Hormuz drive up freight costs, war-risk insurance premiums, and crude prices — feeding directly into domestic fuel and input price inflation. Rising LNG prices have already pushed India toward increased coal-fired power generation, raising environmental and energy transition concerns.

2. Food & Agricultural Security

West Asia supplies over 45% of India's fertiliser imports, while 85% of domestic urea production depends on regasified LNG. The report flags the Kharif season (June onset) as particularly vulnerable — urea stocks of 6.114 million tonnes offer a short-term buffer, but prolonged disruption could compromise planting-season supply chains. This links directly to food inflation and agrarian distress.

3. Trade Disruptions

West Asian markets account for 14% of India's exports and ~21% of imports. Key export sectors at risk:

SectorExposure
Basmati riceHigh
Gems & JewelleryHigh
Tea & ApparelModerate–High
Non-oil exports to West Asia~$48 billion

Route diversions, freight surcharges, and delayed shipments compound the burden on export-oriented MSMEs.

4. Employment & Informal Labour

With ~90% of India's workforce in informal employment, MSME-intensive sectors — hospitality, food processing, construction materials, steel manufacturing, gems and diamonds — face a multi-sided squeeze: rising input costs, disrupted supply chains, and falling export demand. This translates into reduced working hours, job losses, and business closures, with migrant workers being the most vulnerable segment.

5. Remittances & Household Incomes

India's GCC diaspora is its largest remittance source. Reduced Gulf economic activity directly weakens household incomes in remittance-dependent states like Kerala, UP, Bihar, Rajasthan, and Tamil Nadu. This compounds food security pressures for low-income households dependent on transfer incomes.

6. Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals

Raw material costs for medical devices are projected to rise by approximately 50% due to Strait of Hormuz disruptions. Wholesale medicine prices have already increased by 10–15%, signalling emerging healthcare affordability risks for the population.


India's Structural Vulnerabilities: A Summary

Dependency AreaIndia's Exposure
Crude oil imports from West Asia>40%
LPG imports from West Asia~90%
Fertiliser imports from West Asia>45%
Domestic urea dependent on imported LNG~85%
Indians in GCC countries9.37 million
Share of remittances from GCC38–40%
Exports to West Asia~14% of total
Imports from West Asia~21% of total

Implications for India

Economic: Imported inflation, current account pressure, rupee depreciation risk, and fiscal strain from potential fuel subsidy obligations.

Social: Poverty spike concentrated among informal workers, MSME employees, and remittance-dependent households — reversing recent poverty reduction gains.

Strategic: The conflict exposes India's energy import concentration and the absence of adequate diversification in both supplier geography and energy mix.

Developmental: HDI regression of 0.03–0.12 years signals that external shocks can erode years of human development investment, particularly in health and income dimensions.


Policy Imperatives

  • Energy diversification: Accelerate renewable energy transition and expand crude import sources (Russia, Americas, Africa).
  • Strategic reserves: Strengthen the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) capacity.
  • Fertiliser resilience: Invest in domestic urea production and green ammonia as a long-term substitute.
  • Labour diplomacy: Institutional frameworks to protect migrant workers and stabilise remittance flows during geopolitical disruptions.
  • MSME credit buffers: Emergency credit access for MSMEs in conflict-exposed sectors.
  • Adaptive social protection: Expand PM-KISAN, PMGKAY-type buffers that can absorb external price shocks on food and fuel.

Conclusion

The West Asia conflict is not merely a distant geopolitical event — it is a live stress test of India's developmental resilience. India's deep integration with the Gulf economy through energy imports, diaspora labour, remittances, and trade means external military escalations translate swiftly into domestic poverty, food insecurity, and employment shocks. The UNDP's assessment reinforces the urgency of structural reforms in energy security, agricultural input supply chains, and social protection architecture. Building long-term resilience demands diversified partnerships, stronger regional value chains, and proactive diplomacy — turning a crisis moment into a strategic inflection point for sustainable development.

Quick Q&A

Everything you need to know

The West Asia conflict has emerged as a multidimensional shock affecting human development across the Asia-Pacific region, including India. According to the UNDP, the crisis operates through multiple economic transmission channels such as rising fuel prices, increased freight costs, and supply chain disruptions. These factors collectively reduce household purchasing power, increase food insecurity, and strain public finances.

In the Indian context, the impact is particularly significant:

  • Poverty levels are projected to increase, with up to 2.5 million people pushed into poverty.
  • Human Development Index (HDI) progress may decline by 0.03–0.12 years, indicating a setback in health, education, and income indicators.
  • Critical sectors such as agriculture, energy, and MSMEs face rising input costs.

At the regional level, nearly 8.8 million people globally are at risk of falling into poverty, with South Asia being the most affected due to its population size and vulnerability to price shocks.

Thus, the conflict underscores the interconnectedness of global geopolitics and development outcomes. It highlights how external shocks can reverse development gains, especially in developing economies like India, where a large proportion of the population remains economically vulnerable.

India’s vulnerability stems from its structural dependence on West Asia for critical resources and economic linkages. The country imports over 90% of its crude oil, with more than 40% sourced from West Asia. Additionally, around 90% of LPG imports and a significant share of fertilisers also come from the region. This makes India highly sensitive to disruptions in energy supply and price volatility.

Another major factor is trade and remittance dependency:

  • West Asia accounts for 14% of India’s exports and 20.9% of imports.
  • Approximately 9.37 million Indians live in Gulf countries, contributing nearly 38–40% of India’s remittances.
Any slowdown in Gulf economies directly impacts Indian households, especially in states like Kerala and Uttar Pradesh.

Additionally, India’s domestic economic structure amplifies vulnerability. Around 90% of employment is informal, meaning workers lack social security buffers. MSMEs, which rely on imported inputs and energy, are highly exposed to cost shocks.

Thus, India’s vulnerability is not just external but systemic. Its dependence on imports, reliance on remittances, and large informal workforce combine to magnify the adverse effects of global conflicts on domestic development outcomes.

Global conflicts impact domestic economies through a chain of interconnected economic mechanisms. In the case of the West Asia crisis, the first transmission channel is energy price inflation. As oil and gas prices rise, transportation and production costs increase, leading to higher prices for essential goods.

This triggers a cascading effect on food security and poverty:

  • Higher fertiliser costs affect agricultural productivity and increase food prices.
  • Freight and logistics disruptions raise the cost of food distribution.
  • Households experience reduced real incomes due to inflation.

Secondly, remittance shocks play a crucial role. Reduced economic activity in Gulf countries lowers income for migrant workers, thereby decreasing remittances. This directly affects rural consumption and increases vulnerability among dependent families.

A practical example can be seen during the 2008 global financial crisis, when remittance declines led to reduced consumption and increased poverty in several Indian states. Similarly, disruptions during COVID-19 also exposed how fragile migrant income flows can be.

Thus, the interaction of inflation, income loss, and employment disruptions creates a vicious cycle. This cycle pushes marginal households below the poverty line and exacerbates food insecurity, particularly in developing economies with limited social safety nets.

The West Asia conflict poses a dual challenge for India—energy security and environmental sustainability. On one hand, disruptions in oil and gas supplies increase energy prices and threaten economic stability. On the other, they influence policy decisions that may undermine climate commitments.

From an energy security perspective:

  • India’s heavy reliance on imported fossil fuels exposes it to supply shocks.
  • Rising LNG prices have forced a shift towards coal-based power generation.
  • This increases fiscal pressure due to higher import bills and subsidies.

However, this shift has environmental consequences. Increased coal usage leads to higher carbon emissions, contradicting India’s commitments under the Paris Agreement and its target of achieving net-zero emissions by 2070.

Critically, the crisis also presents an opportunity. It highlights the urgency of diversifying energy sources through renewables like solar and wind. For instance, India’s push for the International Solar Alliance and green hydrogen mission can reduce long-term dependence on fossil fuels.

Thus, while the immediate response may involve short-term compromises like increased coal usage, the long-term strategy must focus on energy diversification and sustainability. Balancing economic stability with environmental responsibility remains a key policy challenge for India.

MSMEs and informal workers are among the most vulnerable groups during global economic disruptions. In India, these sectors form the backbone of employment, with nearly 90% of the workforce engaged in informal jobs.

During the West Asia conflict, MSMEs face multiple challenges:

  • Rising input costs due to expensive imported energy and raw materials.
  • Supply chain disruptions leading to delayed or cancelled orders.
  • Limited access to credit, making it difficult to absorb shocks.

For example, gems and jewellery exporters, heavily dependent on West Asian markets, may face reduced demand and logistical delays. Similarly, food processing units may struggle with higher transportation and packaging costs.

Informal workers bear the brunt indirectly. Reduced business activity leads to lower wages, fewer working hours, or job losses. Migrant workers, in particular, face heightened insecurity as they lack formal contracts or social protection.

A comparable situation was observed during the COVID-19 lockdown, when MSMEs shut down and millions of informal workers lost livelihoods. The current conflict risks triggering similar outcomes, albeit through external shocks.

Thus, the impact is both immediate and structural, affecting income stability, employment security, and long-term economic resilience of vulnerable populations.

Mitigating the impact of external shocks like the West Asia conflict requires a multi-pronged and forward-looking policy approach. The strategy should combine short-term relief measures with long-term structural reforms.

In the short term, the focus should be on cushioning vulnerable populations:

  • Strengthening public distribution systems (PDS) to ensure food security.
  • Providing targeted subsidies for fuel and fertilisers.
  • Expanding cash transfer schemes like PM-KISAN and MGNREGA.

In the medium to long term, structural reforms are essential:
  • Energy diversification: निवेश in renewable energy and reduce dependence on imported fossil fuels.
  • Supply chain resilience: Promote local manufacturing and regional trade partnerships.
  • MSME support: Improve access to credit and digital integration.

A key component is strengthening social protection systems. Adaptive social protection mechanisms can help respond dynamically to crises, as seen in countries like Brazil with conditional cash transfer programs.

Finally, enhancing international cooperation is crucial. India can engage in multilateral platforms to ensure stable energy supplies and coordinated responses to global crises.

Thus, a balanced approach combining immediate relief with long-term resilience-building is essential to safeguard India’s economic stability and human development progress in an increasingly uncertain global environment.

Attribution

Original content sources and authors

Sign in to track your reading progress

Comments (0)

Please sign in to comment

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!