Gold Imports and FDI Inflows: Insights from FM Sitharaman

Q: What explains the paradox of weak net FDI inflows into India despite strong macroeconomic fundamentals?

Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) is typically influenced by macroeconomic stability, policy predictability, market size, and growth prospects. India currently exhibits many of these strengths—stable government, predictable taxation regime, improving ease of doing business, and strong growth projections. Yet, net FDI inflows have remained weak, creating a paradox between economic fundamentals and capital flows.One explanation lies in the distinction between gross and net FDI. While gross inflows may remain steady, repatriation of profits and disinvestment by existing investors can reduce net figures. Additionally, global capital flows are increasingly shaped by strategic and geopolitical considerations, including supply-chain realignments, friend-shoring, and risk diversification away from emerging markets.For example, during periods of global monetary tightening or geopolitical tensions, investors may prefer developed markets despite lower returns. Thus, FDI flows are not purely economic decisions; they are embedded within global political economy dynamics. Understanding this paradox requires viewing capital mobility beyond domestic macro indicators.

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman discusses trade deals, gold prices, and FDI concerns amidst changing global dynamics.

Surya

•February 24, 2026•5 mins read

India to pursue trade deals despite tariff uncertainty

Not Started

Trade Strategy, FDI Trends & Gold Imports – Macroeconomic Perspectives

1. Trade Policy Amid Global Uncertainty

India has reiterated its intent to actively pursue trade agreements to expand market access for Indian goods. This comes amid renewed uncertainty in global trade following changes in the United States’ tariff regime, including the resetting of reciprocal tariffs at 15% for goods from all nations after a US Supreme Court verdict.

The government has clarified that it is premature to assess the full implications of these developments. While trade negotiations with the US are under review, policymakers emphasise that sealing a single agreement will not eliminate global uncertainty.

India’s approach reflects a broader strategy of diversifying trade partnerships rather than relying on any one country, thereby reducing vulnerability to geopolitical or protectionist shifts.

In a volatile global trade environment, diversified trade agreements enhance export resilience. Overdependence on one market may expose the economy to tariff shocks and policy reversals.

2. Weak Net FDI Inflows: Beyond Economic Fundamentals

Despite stable macroeconomic indicators, predictable taxation policy, and government stability, net FDI inflows have remained weak. The Finance Minister highlighted that economic fundamentals alone do not always determine capital flows.

She suggested that strategic or geopolitical considerations may be influencing global capital allocation decisions. This implies that FDI movements may increasingly reflect geopolitical alignments rather than purely economic performance.

The issue raises questions about the non-economic factors affecting capital flows, especially in a fragmented global order marked by strategic competition and supply-chain realignment.

“All the fundamentals are fine… You would expect the funds to flow towards such economies like India. But it doesn't come.” — Finance Minister

Capital flows are influenced by both macroeconomic stability and geopolitical perceptions. Ignoring strategic factors in global finance may limit policy effectiveness in attracting investment.

3. Trade Deals & Policy Predictability

The government maintains that uncertainties are an inherent feature of the global economy and cannot be eliminated solely through trade agreements. Instead, a consistent policy direction and diversified engagement are emphasised.

The Commerce Ministry is reviewing developments related to US tariffs and will determine the timing of further negotiations. This indicates a cautious but engaged trade diplomacy stance.

Policy predictability—stable taxation, regulatory clarity, and macroeconomic stability—is positioned as India’s comparative advantage in attracting long-term capital.

Trade diplomacy must balance flexibility with strategic clarity. Rapid shifts in global tariff structures require adaptive negotiation strategies without compromising domestic policy autonomy.

4. Gold Imports & External Sector Stability

India’s import bill for gold has risen due to higher global prices. However, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) notes that from April to December, the value of gold imports increased by only about $1 billion, as lower volumes offset price increases.

A noticeable spurt in both value and volume occurred in January, but authorities have stated that the situation is not yet “alarming.” The current account deficit (CAD) is projected to remain around 1% of GDP, indicating manageable external vulnerability.

India remains structurally import-dependent for gold, which is a preferred household investment and jewellery asset. Seasonal demand spikes during festivals such as Akshay Tritiya contribute to fluctuations.

Gold imports influence the current account and exchange rate stability. Sustained spikes without offsetting exports could widen the CAD and pressure the rupee.

Key External Sector Indicators:

Gold import value increase (Apr–Dec): ~$1 billion
Current Account Deficit (projection): ~1% of GDP
US tariff reset level: 15%

5. Global Gold Prices & Central Bank Buying

Historically, global gold prices were largely influenced by consumption demand from India and China. However, recent price spikes are attributed primarily to increased purchases by central banks globally.

Central bank accumulation of gold as a reserve asset reflects diversification strategies amid geopolitical and currency uncertainties. This has driven prices beyond typical seasonal fluctuations.

For India, higher global prices translate into increased import costs, though authorities indicate that the external sector remains robust.

Central bank reserve diversification affects global commodity prices. In import-dependent economies, sustained price increases may impact trade balances and inflation expectations.

6. Macroeconomic Interlinkages: Trade, Capital Flows & External Balance

The issues of trade negotiations, FDI inflows, and gold imports are interconnected through their impact on the balance of payments.

Weak net FDI inflows may limit capital account cushioning against current account pressures. Conversely, stable CAD levels and diversified trade engagements enhance macroeconomic resilience.

Policymakers emphasise that India’s macroeconomic fundamentals—stable governance, predictable taxation, and moderate deficits—remain intact.

Macroeconomic stability depends on balanced flows across trade, capital, and reserves. A disruption in one component can amplify pressures in others.

Conclusion

India’s strategy reflects calibrated engagement with global trade partners amid tariff uncertainty, recognition of geopolitical influences on FDI flows, and close monitoring of gold-driven external pressures.

While current account projections remain manageable at around 1% of GDP, sustained macroeconomic resilience will depend on diversified trade ties, improved capital inflows, and prudent monitoring of import-intensive commodities like gold.

Quick Q&A

Everything you need to know

Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) is typically influenced by macroeconomic stability, policy predictability, market size, and growth prospects. India currently exhibits many of these strengths—stable government, predictable taxation regime, improving ease of doing business, and strong growth projections. Yet, net FDI inflows have remained weak, creating a paradox between economic fundamentals and capital flows.

One explanation lies in the distinction between gross and net FDI. While gross inflows may remain steady, repatriation of profits and disinvestment by existing investors can reduce net figures. Additionally, global capital flows are increasingly shaped by strategic and geopolitical considerations, including supply-chain realignments, friend-shoring, and risk diversification away from emerging markets.

For example, during periods of global monetary tightening or geopolitical tensions, investors may prefer developed markets despite lower returns. Thus, FDI flows are not purely economic decisions; they are embedded within global political economy dynamics. Understanding this paradox requires viewing capital mobility beyond domestic macro indicators.

In a globalised economy, capital is mobile but also sensitive to geopolitical risks. Strategic tensions—such as US-China rivalry, sanctions regimes, trade wars, or supply-chain restructuring—affect investor confidence and allocation decisions. Even if a country’s macroeconomic indicators are sound, capital may hesitate due to perceived external risks.

For instance, tariff uncertainties following US trade policy shifts create ambiguity about export competitiveness and market access. Similarly, global investors may adjust portfolios based on currency expectations, global interest rates, or political alignments. In such cases, investment decisions are shaped not merely by growth prospects but by strategic risk assessment.

This underscores an important implication: economic strength is necessary but not sufficient to guarantee sustained capital inflows. Countries must also manage geopolitical positioning, diversify trade partnerships, and build resilience against global volatility.

Trade agreements expand market access, reduce tariff barriers, and enhance export competitiveness. For India, forging multiple trade deals helps diversify export destinations and reduce overdependence on any single market. In the context of US tariff resets, uncertainty around reciprocal tariffs can influence investment decisions and supply-chain strategies.

However, as highlighted, sealing one trade agreement does not eliminate global uncertainties. Trade policy volatility—such as sudden tariff hikes—can disrupt global value chains. For example, during earlier US-China tariff escalations, firms restructured sourcing strategies, affecting emerging economies differently.

Therefore, India’s strategy of pursuing diversified trade agreements—with the EU, UK, and Indo-Pacific partners—aims to reduce vulnerability. A robust external sector, reflected in a manageable current account deficit (around 1% of GDP), provides a buffer against such shocks.

Gold plays a dual role in India—as a cultural asset and as a financial hedge. Rising global prices, partly driven by central bank purchases, have increased the value of imports. While volumes were initially offsetting price increases, recent spikes in both value and volume warrant monitoring.

From a macroeconomic standpoint, high gold imports widen the trade deficit since India is import-dependent for the metal. However, the current account deficit remains manageable at around 1% of GDP, indicating resilience. Moreover, seasonal demand during festivals and investment hedging during uncertainty partly explain the surge.

The critical concern is whether gold demand crowds out productive financial savings. If households allocate excessive savings to gold rather than financial instruments, it may constrain capital formation. Policymakers must balance cultural preferences with macro stability through instruments like sovereign gold bonds.

If FDI inflows remain weak amid global uncertainties, India must adopt a multi-pronged strategy. First, strengthen domestic investment drivers through public capital expenditure and improved ease of doing business. Domestic savings mobilisation can compensate for volatile external capital.

Second, diversify external financing sources by promoting portfolio stability, deepening bond markets, and enhancing sovereign credit credibility. Encouraging long-term institutional investors such as pension and insurance funds can reduce dependence on volatile short-term flows.

Third, maintain a robust external buffer—adequate forex reserves, prudent current account management, and calibrated exchange-rate flexibility. For example, during the 2013 “taper tantrum,” India strengthened macro fundamentals to restore investor confidence. Similarly, proactive reforms and trade diversification can mitigate prolonged global uncertainty.