Rupee Rising? India’s Cautious March Towards Currency Internationalisation

Exploring how India's approach to currency internationalisation can reshape global trade dynamics over decades.
S
Surya
3 mins read
Rupee internationalisation gains gradual momentum
Not Started

Introduction

The Reserve Bank of India’s decision since January 2026 to publish data on rupee invoicing and settlement marks a structural shift in India’s external sector strategy. Though only about 5% of India’s trade is currently settled in rupees, this represents the early phase of a multi-decade transition toward rupee internationalisation.

The urgency gained momentum after Russia’s exclusion from SWIFT and freezing of dollar assets in 2022, exposing vulnerabilities in the dollar-dominated global financial system.


Money performs four key functions:

  • Medium of exchange
  • Unit of account
  • Store of value
  • Standard of deferred payment

Internationalisation extends these classical functions beyond national borders.

Macroeconomics explains that exchange rate stability, capital flows, and balance of payments sustainability are critical in open economies. Rupee internationalisation must therefore be aligned with macroeconomic stability.


Why Internationalise the Rupee?

1️⃣ Strategic Autonomy

Reducing overdependence on the dollar-dominated payment system protects India from geopolitical financial shocks.

2️⃣ Lower Exchange Rate Risk

Local currency invoicing reduces currency volatility for exporters.

3️⃣ Reduced Demand for Hard Currency

Hard currencies such as the US dollar, euro, yen, and pound dominate global trade. Local currency arrangements reduce pressure on foreign exchange reserves.

4️⃣ Trade Efficiency

Through Special Rupee Vostro Accounts (SRVA), payments are settled directly in rupees.


Progress So Far

  • RBI’s Inter-Departmental Group (IDG) report (July 2023) laid out 10 short-term, 5 medium-term, and 1 long-term milestone.

  • MoUs signed with UAE, Indonesia, Maldives, and Mauritius.

  • 83 banks from 35 countries have opened SRVA accounts.

  • FY26 (Apr–Dec):

    • 6.08% of exports and 4.82% of imports invoiced in rupee.
    • 2.84% of exports and 2.36% of imports settled in rupee.
  • Indian bonds included in:

    • JPMorgan EM Local Currency Index (June 2024)
    • Bloomberg EM Index (Jan 2025)
    • FTSE Russell EM Index (Sept 2025)

Though modest, these are foundational steps.


Enabling Conditions Identified by IDG

  1. Deep and liquid domestic financial markets
  2. Simplified foreign portfolio investment norms
  3. Inclusion in major global bond indices
  4. Offshore rupee liquidity through Indian banks
  5. Linking Indian payment systems (RTGS, SFMS) with foreign systems
  6. Gradual sequencing: Trade → Non-trade → Capital account transactions

Addressing Concerns

⚠ Exchange Rate Volatility

Greater cross-border use of rupee may increase volatility.

⚠ Reserve Depletion

Expanded convertibility could strain foreign exchange reserves.

⚠ Monetary Policy Autonomy

Rapid capital account opening may weaken RBI’s policy effectiveness.

However, the RBI’s incremental approach mitigates systemic risks. As Class 12 Macroeconomics emphasises, macroeconomic stability and calibrated capital flows are essential in open economies.


Long-Term Aspirations

  • Inclusion of rupee in IMF’s SDR basket
  • Entry into the Continuous Linked Settlement (CLS) system
  • Emergence as a convertible and reserve currency

These require sustained reforms, institutional credibility, and decades of trust-building.


Geopolitical Context

Globalisation has deepened interdependence. However, the weaponisation of financial systems shows that excessive dependence creates strategic vulnerabilities. Rupee internationalisation is therefore not merely economic reform, but an assertion of sovereign financial capability.


Conclusion

Currency internationalisation cannot be achieved by declaration; it must be earned through macroeconomic stability, deep financial markets, institutional credibility, and sustained trade integration.

As is often said in international finance:

“Reserve currency status rests not on power alone, but on trust.”

If India maintains financial discipline and gradual reform, the rupee can evolve from a domestic medium of exchange to a credible global settlement currency by 2047 — reflecting both economic maturity and sovereign confidence.

Quick Q&A

Everything you need to know

The internationalisation of the rupee refers to the process by which the Indian rupee is increasingly used in cross-border trade, investment, invoicing, settlement, and as a reserve currency by other countries. It implies that non-residents are willing to hold and transact in rupees beyond India’s borders. Currently, around 5–6% of India’s trade is invoiced in rupees, indicating an early but significant shift.

India is operationalising this through a structured roadmap proposed by the RBI’s Inter-Departmental Group (IDG). Key measures include

  • Entering into Local Currency Arrangements (LCAs) with trading partners such as UAE, Indonesia, Maldives, and Mauritius
  • Allowing trade settlement through Special Rupee Vostro Accounts (SRVAs)
  • Providing equal export incentives for rupee invoicing
  • Facilitating offshore rupee accounts for NRIs

The broader strategy also includes deepening financial markets, simplifying foreign portfolio investment norms, and pushing for inclusion of Indian bonds in global indices. The process is gradual, recognising that currency internationalisation is a multi-decade structural transformation rather than an administrative reform.

The urgency stems from the weaponisation of global financial systems, particularly after the U.S. froze Russia’s dollar assets and excluded it from SWIFT following the Ukraine invasion. This highlighted the vulnerabilities of countries dependent on dollar-dominated payment systems. For India, it underscored the strategic importance of reducing over-reliance on hard currencies such as the U.S. dollar.

Internationalisation enhances economic sovereignty. By invoicing and settling trade in rupees, India can reduce exchange rate risks for exporters, lower transaction costs, and conserve foreign exchange reserves. It also cushions the economy from external sanctions risks or disruptions in global payment networks.

Moreover, as India aspires to become a developed economy by 2047, a globally accepted currency would strengthen its financial influence. Currency power often reflects geopolitical weight, as seen in the dominance of the dollar and euro. Thus, rupee internationalisation is both an economic and strategic imperative.

Under Local Currency Arrangements, India and its partner countries agree to invoice and settle trade in their respective local currencies instead of relying on a third currency like the dollar. This reduces demand for hard currencies and mitigates exchange rate volatility for exporters.

Operationally, payments are routed through Special Rupee Vostro Accounts (SRVAs) maintained by foreign banks with Indian banks. For example, if an Indian exporter ships goods to the UAE, payment can be credited in rupees to the SRVA held by a UAE bank in India. Similarly, imports can be settled through corresponding arrangements.

As of now, 83 banks from 35 countries have opened SRVAs, including banks from advanced economies. This institutional mechanism creates the plumbing required for rupee trade. Over time, such arrangements can expand beyond trade into remittances and capital flows, provided financial market depth improves.

Critics argue that greater cross-border use of the rupee may increase exchange rate volatility and complicate monetary policy. If foreign entities hold significant rupee balances, sudden capital outflows could pressure the currency. There are also concerns about depletion of foreign exchange reserves if the rupee becomes fully convertible without adequate safeguards.

However, these risks can be mitigated through an incremental approach. The RBI’s roadmap prioritises trade settlement first, followed by non-trade transactions and eventually capital account liberalisation. Strengthening domestic bond markets and ensuring adequate liquidity are preconditions for sustainable internationalisation.

Historical examples, such as China’s cautious internationalisation of the yuan, demonstrate that gradualism reduces systemic shocks. Therefore, while risks exist, calibrated sequencing, regulatory vigilance, and macroeconomic stability can manage potential disruptions.

Inclusion in global bond indices such as the JPMorgan Emerging Market Local Currency Index (2024) and Bloomberg Emerging Market Index (2025) enhances global investor access to Indian sovereign bonds. This increases demand for rupee-denominated assets, thereby strengthening the currency’s global profile.

When global funds track these indices, they are required to allocate capital to Indian bonds. This deepens liquidity, broadens the investor base, and integrates Indian financial markets with global capital flows. Although Bloomberg’s flagship Global Aggregate Index has deferred inclusion, steady progress signals growing investor confidence.

Such steps are crucial because a currency becomes international not merely by policy declaration but by market acceptance. Deep, liquid, and accessible financial markets are essential foundations for reserve currency status.

In such a scenario, India would need to activate alternative payment architectures. One approach is directly linking Indian systems such as RTGS and SFMS with partner countries’ payment networks, bypassing SWIFT. Bilateral digital payment corridors could ensure continuity of trade and remittances.

India could also expand LCAs and promote rupee-denominated trade settlements with key partners in Asia, Africa, and the Gulf. Diversification of forex reserves and strengthening domestic financial resilience would be critical safeguards.

However, the broader lesson is preventive rather than reactive: building financial autonomy before crises emerge. By gradually internationalising the rupee and expanding payment linkages, India reduces systemic vulnerability and enhances strategic autonomy in an uncertain geopolitical landscape.

Attribution

Original content sources and authors

Sign in to track your reading progress

Comments (0)

Please sign in to comment

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!