Populist Welfare Schemes and the Opportunity Cost of Education Spending

Examining how increasing pension and cash-transfer commitments in Haryana may be crowding out investments in education, health and skill development.

Gopi

•February 26, 2026•5 mins read

Haryana’s Fiscal Shift: Rising Welfare, Shrinking Human Capital Share

Not Started

1. Changing Expenditure Priorities in Haryana

Over the past 15 years, Haryana’s budgetary pattern reflects a structural shift in expenditure priorities. While allocations for social welfare have expanded significantly, the share of education in the total budget has steadily declined. Simultaneously, the burden of debt and interest payments has increased, constraining fiscal space for developmental sectors.

This shift assumes importance because education and health are core components of human capital formation. A sustained decline in their relative share, despite rising total expenditure, raises questions about long-term productivity, institutional quality, and inclusive growth.

In 2010–11, education expenditure stood at ₹5,946.29 crore out of a total expenditure of ₹39,554.83 crore, while social welfare received ₹2,176.15 crore. By 2025–26, although the absolute allocation to education increased to ₹22,312.46 crore, social welfare spending has expanded more rapidly, altering sectoral priorities.

Public finance choices reveal a State’s development strategy. When revenue expenditure on transfers rises faster than investment in education and health, long-term growth potential may weaken, even if short-term welfare gains are visible.

2. Rise of Welfare Transfers and Fiscal Concentration

A significant proportion of Haryana’s social welfare budget is concentrated in two major schemes — the Old Age Samman Allowance Scheme (1966) and the Deen Dayal Lado Lakshmi Yojana (promised ahead of the 2024 Assembly election).

Of the ₹18,751.78 crore allocated in 2025–26 towards social empowerment, nutrition, and welfare of Scheduled Castes and Backward Classes, ₹10,210 crore is directed to these two schemes alone. This indicates high fiscal concentration in income-transfer programmes.

Key Data:

Total social welfare allocation (2025–26): ₹18,751.78 crore
Allocation to two major schemes: ₹10,210 crore
Education allocation (2025–26): ₹22,312.46 crore
Old Age Samman beneficiaries: 20,05,367 persons
Monthly pension: ₹3,200
Lado Lakshmi Yojana beneficiaries: 8 lakh women
Monthly assistance: ₹2,100
Total women in State (electoral data): 95 lakh

The scale of these schemes reflects political responsiveness to vulnerable groups. However, the manifesto promise of universal coverage for women, if implemented fully, could substantially increase fiscal liabilities.

When welfare expenditure becomes structurally embedded without parallel revenue augmentation, it may crowd out developmental spending and increase fiscal stress, especially in high-debt contexts.

3. Education Spending: Relative Decline and Institutional Outcomes

Despite increased absolute outlays, Haryana’s spending on education as a share of total expenditure remains below the national average.

As per the RBI’s “State Finance: A Study of Budgets of 2025–26”, the national average for expenditure on education, sports, arts and culture is 13.1% of total expenditure. Haryana trails behind several comparable States.

Comparative Data:

Himachal Pradesh: 17.5%
Uttar Pradesh: 13.0%
Rajasthan: 16.4%
Delhi: 19%
Punjab: 9.3%

Technical education allocation has declined from 1.08% to 0.6% of total expenditure over the period.

Institutional indicators further reflect stress:

50% teaching posts vacant in government and aided colleges (RTI data)
50% vacancy of ITI instructors
Secondary dropout rate (Classes 9–12): 4.9%
Government schools with internet: 69.3%
Private schools with internet: 94.5%

Additionally, no university from Haryana features in the QS World University Rankings 2026 or among the top 150 institutions in NIRF, unlike Tamil Nadu and Maharashtra.

Lower relative investment in education, combined with high vacancy rates and digital gaps, directly affects learning outcomes, employability, and innovation capacity — undermining long-term competitiveness.

4. Health Expenditure: Persistent Underinvestment

Although health spending has increased in absolute terms, it remains low relative to State capacity and peer comparison.

Haryana spends only 0.77% of GSDP on health (Performance Audit, 2022–23). This is significantly below expectations for a high per capita income State.

Comparative health expenditure (percentage of total expenditure):

Himachal Pradesh: 5.8%
Uttar Pradesh: 6.1%
Rajasthan: 7.6%
Delhi: 12.9%
National average: 5.7% (RBI Report)

Low public health investment can lead to higher out-of-pocket expenditure, strain on public health infrastructure, and vulnerability during health crises.

Underinvestment in health weakens productivity and increases household financial distress. For a State with rising fiscal commitments, inadequate health spending may exacerbate inequality and reduce human development outcomes.

5. Debt and Fiscal Sustainability Concerns

The rising share of debt and interest payments in total expenditure signals growing fiscal rigidity. As committed expenditure increases, discretionary spending space narrows.

In such a scenario, expansion of large welfare schemes, without proportional revenue mobilisation, can intensify structural deficits.

This is particularly relevant for States, as they face limits under the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management (FRBM) framework and depend on central transfers.

When debt servicing rises alongside revenue transfers, capital expenditure and human development sectors often bear the adjustment burden, affecting long-term growth sustainability.

6. Governance and Institutional Implications

The Haryana Vision Document 2047 acknowledges structural gaps in higher education quality, infrastructure deficits, and vacancy rates. Despite being a high-income State relative to the national average, Haryana spends less on education and health as a share of social service expenditure compared to peer States.

This creates a paradox: higher per capita income without commensurate human capital investment.

Expert suggestions include:

Leveraging Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) funds for social sector support
Expanding Public-Private Partnerships (PPP), particularly for infrastructure
Improving fiscal prioritisation and outcome-based budgeting

"The capital outlay for education is a cause for concern for Haryana." — Rupamanjari Sinha Ray, MDI Gurugram

States aiming for long-term economic leadership must align fiscal allocations with institutional strengthening. Otherwise, income advantages may not translate into durable developmental gains.

7. Broader UPSC Linkages

GS Paper II: State finances, welfare schemes, education and health policy, federal fiscal management
GS Paper III: Human capital formation, inclusive growth, fiscal sustainability
Essay: Welfare vs development expenditure; populism and fiscal prudence
Prelims: RBI State Finance Reports; GSDP-based health expenditure; FRBM framework

Conclusion

Haryana’s evolving fiscal structure reflects a shift toward expansive welfare transfers amid rising debt obligations. While such schemes enhance social security, sustained underinvestment in education and health risks weakening the State’s long-term human capital base.

A calibrated balance between welfare commitments and developmental expenditure will determine whether Haryana’s high income status translates into durable institutional strength and inclusive growth.

Quick Q&A

Everything you need to know

Over the past 15 years, Haryana’s budgetary trends indicate a structural shift in expenditure priorities. While the absolute allocation for education has increased, its share in total expenditure has declined. In contrast, allocations for social welfare—particularly cash transfer schemes such as the Old Age Samman Allowance and Deen Dayal Lado Lakshmi Yojana—have grown significantly. In 2025-26, over ₹10,210 crore out of ₹18,751.78 crore for social welfare was allocated to just two schemes, demonstrating concentration of fiscal resources in direct benefit transfers.

At the same time, the State’s expenditure on debt servicing and interest payments has risen sharply, limiting fiscal space for capital-intensive sectors such as education and health. Despite Haryana being a high per capita income State, its health expenditure remains at only 0.77% of GSDP—below national averages and behind several other States.

Thus, the budget reflects a tilt toward welfare-oriented and electorally salient schemes, while long-term investments in human capital formation appear relatively constrained.

Education is a foundational driver of long-term economic growth, productivity, and social mobility. For a relatively prosperous State like Haryana, declining proportional investment in education raises concerns about sustainability of growth and equity. The State lags behind others such as Tamil Nadu and Maharashtra in higher education rankings, with none of its institutions featuring prominently in QS or NIRF rankings.

Furthermore, structural challenges—such as a 4.9% secondary-level dropout rate, 50% vacancies in college teaching posts, and limited internet access in government schools—suggest quality deficits. Reduced spending on technical education and skill development (from 1.08% to 0.6% of total expenditure) may also undermine employability in an increasingly technology-driven economy.

Neglecting education may yield short-term fiscal flexibility but risks long-term stagnation in human capital formation, innovation capacity, and competitiveness.

Populist welfare schemes such as pensions and direct cash transfers play a vital role in providing income security to vulnerable populations. For instance, the Old Age Samman Allowance benefits over 20 lakh individuals, offering ₹3,200 per month, while the Lado Lakshmi Yojana supports economically weaker women. These schemes enhance consumption, reduce poverty, and may stimulate local demand.

However, heavy concentration of fiscal resources in recurrent transfers may crowd out capital investments in sectors like education, health, and infrastructure. Unlike welfare transfers, which address immediate consumption needs, investments in human capital generate multiplier effects over time.

A balanced fiscal strategy requires harmonising social protection with productive expenditure. Excessive reliance on politically attractive schemes without parallel investment in institutional capacity may weaken long-term developmental prospects.

Haryana spends only 0.77% of its GSDP on health, which is significantly below the national average and far behind States such as Rajasthan (7.6%), Uttar Pradesh (6.1%), and Delhi (12.9%) in terms of budget share. Despite incremental increases in absolute allocation, health spending as a proportion of total expenditure remains modest.

Low public investment in health can exacerbate out-of-pocket expenditure, reduce healthcare access for marginalised communities, and strain public health infrastructure. The 2022-23 performance audit also flagged infrastructure and service management issues.

Inadequate health spending not only affects human development indicators but also economic productivity, as poor health outcomes directly impact labour force participation and workforce efficiency.

A comprehensive reform strategy would involve enhancing revenue mobilisation while rationalising expenditure. The State could explore innovative financing models such as public-private partnerships (PPPs) for infrastructure and leverage Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) funds for education and health initiatives, as suggested by policy experts.

Second, outcome-based budgeting should be introduced to assess the impact of welfare schemes and ensure that they are targeted efficiently. Simultaneously, increased capital outlay in education—particularly in teacher recruitment, digital infrastructure, and technical training—would strengthen long-term growth.

Finally, debt sustainability frameworks must be reinforced to contain rising interest burdens. By integrating social protection with human capital investment, Haryana can align fiscal policy with its Vision 2047 developmental aspirations.