Directive: Discuss — Intro + context → Side A → Side B → Considered view → Conclusion
Intro: Gender diversity in governance = not just representation but epistemic enrichment of democracy.
Side A (For): Diverse lived experiences → richer deliberation; women legislators = amplify ignored issues (sanitation, childcare, domestic violence); SHG + informal economy expertise → ground-level policy rationality; PRI evidence → women in local governance = better public goods delivery.
Side B (Against): Representation ≠ agency; proxy candidacy risk = male voices through female faces; elite capture = privileged women ≠ all women; institutional culture of aggression + performative politics = women's voices marginalised even when present.
Considered view: Gender diversity = necessary but not sufficient; effectiveness depends on party structures + social attitudes + institutional culture enabling genuine participation.
Verdict: Women's perspectives reshape outcomes only when representation + agency + voice align — diversity in seats must translate to diversity in deliberation.