Directive: EXAMINE Intro → C1 → C2 → C3 → C4 → Qual → Concl
Intro → Longer lives ≠ healthier lives. 60+ → 20% by 2050; frailty affects 1 in 4 over 50; zero policy visibility in India.
C1 → Health system gap → acute-illness oriented; frailty ∉ reimbursable; Ayushman Bharat = hospital-only; NPCHE = limited reach. C2 → Clinical gap → frailty assessment tools unused; geriatric clinics scarce in district hospitals; medical education treats ageing as inevitable. C3 → Research gap → CRATUS trial promising but Phase III pending; CDSCO bridging trial needed; unregulated stem cell clinics = past exploitation risk. C4 → Social gap → frailty = falls + hospitalisation + surgical risk; elderly enter hospitals already fragile → higher costs + complications.
Qual → ICMR guidelines + SC Ranjitsinh (Art.21) + existing NPCHE = policy hooks available; gap is implementation + prioritisation, not legal absence.
Concl → Frailty screening in AB-PMJAY + district geriatric clinics + ASHA training + ICMR bridging trials + CDSCO geriatric biologics pathway = dignity in ageing.